Video Examines Criminalization of Mariners (9/10)


Back to News

The organization Seafarers’ Rights International (SRI) has posted a new video tackling the timely subject of criminalization of mariners. Check it out HERE


SRI is funded by the Seafarers’ Trust of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (the SIU is an ITF affiliate).


The text from SRI accompanying the video post follows:


Seafarers And The Criminal Law


It is an inherent risk in the working lives of seafarers that they may be subjected to criminal charges either of a professional or a non-professional nature. Seafaring is transnational by nature. As seafarers transit from port to port, they are subject to the entire range of criminal laws of those port states. They cannot know and they are unlikely to have been warned about local criminal laws, and hence they are at risk of committing an offence without any awareness or intention to do so. Further, in recent years, several legal developments at international, regional and national levels have criminalized a number of previously considered lawful seafaring activities and created a blame culture, particularly in relation to environmental incidents such as oil pollution.


In an era where ‘human rights’ are considered sacrosanct and ‘fairness’ a right in itself, seafarers sometimes seem to be excluded from the entitlements accorded to others. They may be foreign nationals, and after an incident there is often a reluctance to release seafarer defendants or witnesses who are deemed to be a ‘flight risk’, and who might not appear at a subsequent trial. They are, therefore, treated differently and less fairly than nationals, and are often discriminated against. They might have the continued support of their employers, but if they are less fortunate once the ship itself is released, they may find themselves friendless in a strange land, facing charges that are incomprehensible to them under a wholly alien system of justice, and with defense counsel unfamiliar with the technical nuances of a maritime scene. Language, and the lack of adequate translation facilities, might well be a serious handicap.


International efforts


Right across the shipping industry, there is a strong belief that somehow the tide which increasingly threatens seafarers with criminal sanctions and discriminates against them must be turned. Seafarers’ organizations, their employers, regulators and non-governmental bodies – in addition to seafarers themselves – are agreed that this important body of essential workers needs protection from unfairness and injustice and, moreover, to reassure seafarers that they will be treated properly should they become involved in an incident or accident, particularly under a foreign jurisdiction. It has been suggested on more than one occasion that the continued detention of crew members in the past, whether criminal charges have been laid against them or not, has been used as a bargaining chip in a subsequent case over liability and compensation.


In May 2004, the Legal Committee of the IMO endorsed the proposal to establish a joint IMO/ILO Working Group on Fair Treatment of Seafarers. In 2006, the IMO and the ILO promulgated the “Guidelines on the Fair Treatment of Seafarers in the event of a Maritime Accident.” The objective of the Guidelines is “to ensure that seafarers are treated fairly following a maritime accident and during any investigation and detention by public authorities and that detention is for no longer than necessary.” The Guidelines, which now must be read in the light of the Casualty Investigation Code, “do not seek to interfere with any State’s domestic, criminal or civil law processes….” They are limited to the investigation of “maritime accidents,” although there is a general invitation “to take note of the principles contained in these Guidelines when considering the fair treatment of seafarers in other circumstances where innocent seafarers might be detained.”


But the criminalization cases that have seized the attention of the global industry have encouraged the strong belief that something more than codes or recommendations must be produced to protect seafarers from the injustices which they can suffer when they are involved in incidents and accidents. The situation it is suggested will impact upon both recruitment and retention at a time when both are important for the industry’s future.




Share |